Spin doctoring fail - a danish twist: 911 - proof of nano thermite!

See, I always told you.
Do NOT believe, what THEY want you to believe.
Question authoritative definitions of reality:
It is not just "as it is" - but as it is defined.

'come on Neo, take that bloddy pill and get things over with!

Not - sorry I am not being serious here, not as serious as the issue bringing me back for a small visit to our dear blog would deserve.

There is scientific proof of non-ignited nano thermite particles in the dust of NY after the 911 incidents:




I just wonder, how long it will take for this to reach mainstream media (if at all).

Yes? Can we?

Interesting side twist:
If this should hold as proof in court, then it will be intersting to see how

a) the company responsible for the security of the towers explains the tons of thermite - or
b) whether the port authority might come up with a "yes, after the first 1993 attac, we had a secret addendum to the lease - enforcing clean demolition in any case of emergency=
c) how the insurances will react: They were made to pay for 2 terror individual incidents (on each world trade tower a couple of billion US$ per tower payable to Mr Silverstein)
d) When will Mr Silverstein, who is also quoted to have said to "pull" i.e. "demolish?" the third building (WTC7) come forward under oath to clarify things?
e) I really would like to learn from O. Bin Laden, how he got all that thermite in there - and why he sarficed his bretheren - as backups?